Ammonia--chemically NH₃--is a critical ingredient in fertilizers, and it could play a much larger role in a future energy economy. As we show below, producing ammonia today with carbon capture and sequestration is cost-effective, and so is production by clean energy electrolysis if the electricity source is sufficiently cheap.
Over 80% ammonia is used for fertilizer today, with the remainder used for explosives, solvents, nitric acids, and other industrial chemicals 1.
In the future ammonia may play several important roles in the energy system.
Role | Current Dominant Methods | Rationale | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Seasonal Energy Storage | Pumped Hydro | More efficient, lower storage cost than hydrogen | --- |
Transportation of Hydrogen | Local production, pipeline, liquefaction, compression | More efficient, lower cost | --- |
Load Balancing | Gas peaking | Ammonia electrolyzers can be run intermittently | Increases cost of ammonia |
Thermal Power | Rankine cycle (water) | Kalina cycle would improve thermal plant performance, especially for geothermal and OTEC | --- |
Carbon Capture and Sequestration | --- | Improved efficiency and lower cost | Design challenges, R&D needed |
Transportation Fuel | Petroleum-derived fuels | Little or no modification of combustion engines required | Low volumetric and gravimetric density, high combustion temperature, toxicity |
In an energy system with high volumes of variable renewable energy and/or hydrogen, ammonia may be the best option for seasonal energy storage and long-distance energy transportation 5. While ammonia can be used directly as transportation fuel, its low gravimetric and volumetric density, toxicity, and other drawbacks may limit this role.
The cost of producing ammonia is estimated as follows.
Because the cost of ammonia from electrolysis is dominated by the cost of electricity, rather than equipment capital costs, it is possible to produce ammonia intermittently to match low electricity prices. This may be useful for load balancing on a high renewable grid.
There are novel ammonia production methods under development that may reduce further reduce costs. Examples are biological nitrogen fixation, mimicking the processed used by natural bacteria; electrochemical methods that would produce ammonia directly from nitrogen and water without producing hydrogen; and chemical looping methods 7. Each of these methods is still far from commercial production.
Ammonia is much easier to transport than hydrogen, which makes it particularly attractive for long-duration transport and storage of intermittent energy.
Modern ammonia production is efficient, and there is potential for modest further efficiency improvements. The following are estimates of the onsite energy requirements for current and future ammonia production methods.
Electricity is a higher quality fuel than coal, natural gas, or biomass, and there may be more primary energy behind the electricity than what is consumed onsite. Nuclear thermochemical electrolysis and solid state ammonia synthesis are not yet commercial methods.
For electrolysis ammonia to serve a role in a low carbon energy system, a low cost and low carbon electricity source is needed. Most of the energy for electrolyzed ammonia is used for the splitting of water to produce hydrogen.
Ammonia production methods show the following life cycle greenhouse gas emissions.
Ammonia is highly toxic, necessitating a high level of care in an expanded ammonia distribution system and potentially creating a public acceptance barrier 5. If used at a large scale, nitrous oxide emissions 14 and ozone depletion 15 will be challenges.
With an energy density significantly higher than lithium-ion batteries, ammonia, including from low-carbon production, is suitable for most forms of transportation except long-haul aviation.
Goor, G., Glenneberg, J., Jacobi, S., Dadabhoy, J., Candido, E. Ammonia. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Print ISBN: 9783527303854, Online ISBN: 9783527306732. June 2000 (first published). ↩
Afif, A., Radenahmad, N., Cheok, Q., Shams, S., Kim, J. H., Azad, A. K. "Ammonia-fed fuel cells: A comprehensive review". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, pp. 822-835. July 2016. ↩
Kobayashi, H., Hayakawa, A., Kunkuma, A., Somarathne, A., Okafor, E. "Science and technology of ammonia combustion". Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 37(1), pp. 109-133. 2019. ↩
Philibert, P. "Insights Series 2017 - Renewable Energy for Industry". International Energy Agency. November 2017. ↩ ↩2
Valera-Medina, A., Xiao, H., Owen-Jones, M., David, W., Bowen, P. "Ammonia for power". Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 69, pp. 63-102. November 2018. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
International Energy Agency. "The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing today's opportunities". June 2019. ↩
The Royal Society. "Ammonia: zero-carbon fertiliser, fuel and energy store". Policy Briefing. February 2020. ↩
Kawakami, Y., Endo, S., Hirai, H. "A Feasibility Study on the Supply Chain of CO₂-Free Ammonia with CCS and EOR". The Institute of Energy Economics Japan. April 2019. ↩
Brown, T. "Ammonia technology portfolio: optimize for energy efficiency and carbon efficiency". Ammonia Industry. March 2018. ↩
Cefic. "European chemistry for growth: Unlocking a competitive, low carbon and energy efficient future". Supported by Ecofys. April 2013. ↩ ↩2
Dana, A., Elishav, O., Bardow, A., Shter, G., Grader, G. "Nitrogen‐Based Fuels: A Power‐to‐Fuel‐to‐Power Analysis". Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) 55(31), pp. 8798–8805. July 2016. ↩
Singh, V., Dincer, I., Rosen, M. Chapter 4.2 - Life Cycle Assessment of Ammonia Production Methods. Exergetic, Energetic and Environmental Dimensions. Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-813734-5. 2018. ↩
Young, B., Krynock, M., Carlson, D., Hawkins, T., Marriott, J., Morelli, B., Jamieson, M., Cooney, G., Skone, T. "Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States". International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 91, Article 102821. December 2019. ↩
Bicer, Y., Dincer, I. "Life cycle assessment of ammonia utilization in city transportation and power generation". Journal of Cleaner Production 170, pp. 1594-1601. January 2018. ↩
Ravishankara, A., Daniel, S., Portmann, R. "Nitrous oxide (N₂O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century". Science 326, pp. 123-125. 2009. ↩