Grid Overview

Electricity is the most versatile form of energy available. All forms of primary energy can be transformed into electricity, and electricity can, at least in principle, provide almost all the energy needed by the economy. In this section we give a brief overview of how the electric grid is powered and how it can be managed.

World electricity production is growing both in absolute terms and as a share of total energy, nearly tripling since 1985.

The image: "world_electricity.svg" cannot be found!

Source: BP 1.

The image: "percentage_of_world_electricity_from_fossil_fuels.svg" cannot be found!

Source: BP 1.

The grid is a major component in the cost of electricity. Grid operators purchase electricity from power plants on the wholesale market, while end-use customers purchase electricity from the grid through utilities in the retail market. In the United States, the wholesale price of electricity comprises only 35% of a typical customer's bill, while delivery costs are 45%. These figures vary widely by region.

See also our detailed analysis of electrification in the United States.

Expanded Electricity Demand

In a broad clean energy system, electricity is likely to play a greatly expanded role.

The image: "electrification.svg" cannot be found!

Potential new demands for electricity if electricity is used to replace fossil fuels or bioenergy in other portions of the economy, to substitute for land use in agriculture, remove atmospheric carbon dioxide via direct air capture, or desalinate water. For potential electricity demand from transportation, see our analysis of energy demand in transportation and agriculture and replacement with electric vehicles, hydrogen, ammonia, or synthetic jet fuel. See also our analyses of the chemical industry, industrial heat, residential and commercial heat, intensive farming for discussion of cultured meat, power-to-food, and greenhosues, and water usage and provision for desalination. See Realmonte et al. 2 for discussion of direct air capture.

Note the following assumptions in our estimates. All direct use of fossil fuels and bioenergy in the residential and commercial sectors, as reported by the IEA 3, is assumed to be used for heat such that each unit of fuel burnt provides 0.8 useful units of heat. It is assumed to be replaced by heat pumps with a coefficient of performance of 2.5 (high energy case) or 4.0 (low energy case). Based on Lord et al. 4, electrification is assumed to save 20% onsite industrial heat energy. For electrification of the chemical industry, current electricity needs are assumed to be 80% of the needs in 2030 as reported by Kätelhön et al. 2. Efficiency of hydrogen electrolysis is estimated at 66.8% in the high energy scenario and 80% in the low energy scenario.

Most, but not all, uses of fossil fuels and anthropogenic emissions sources are covered by this analysis. Not covered are about 25% of emissions from chemicals, lubricants, crops other than cereals, soy, and tomatoes, and sources of fluorinated gas emissions.

Sources of Electricity

Fossil fuels provide nearly two-thirds of world electricity.

The image: "Sources of Electricity.svg" cannot be found!

Source: IEA 5.

With electricity demand growing rapidly, particularly with a potential shift toward electricity to power heavy industry and automobiles, there is an urgent need to shift the generation toward less polluting sources.

Integrating Renewables

Some renewable energy sources, particularly wind and solar, produce power in ways that are highly variable and often unpredictable. This necessitates grid designs that can handle intermittency. There are many strategies for doing so.

The following are estimates of the costs of three strategies to enable the United States to supply 80% of electricity from wind and solar. The strategies are to overbuild renewables and curtail the excess, high voltage direct current cables to connect regional grids, and energy storage.

The image: "integration_strategies.svg" cannot be found!

Leading strategies to enable an 80% variable renewable electric grid in the United States, expressed in overall costs and as a contribution to the per-kWh cost of electricity. US electricity is reported by the EIA 6. The Cost estimate of the overbuild strategy is given by Perez et al. 7; for the HVDC strategy, the amount of cable needed is estimated by Shaner et al. 8 and the cost of cable is estimated by MacDonald et al. 9. For the storage strategy, storage needs are estimated by Shaner et al. 8 and the cost of storage is estimated by Fu et al. 10 and Lazard 11.

Power Outages

A loss of electrical power, especially an unexpected loss, is a disruptive and costly event. The following costs for some major historic blackouts have been estimated.

The image: "blackout_cost.svg" cannot be found!

Sources: Adibi and Martins 12, Electricity Consumers Resource Council 13, Koran 14, Oseni and Pollitt 15, Schmidthaler and Reichl 16.

As shown above and confirmed by other sources (e.g. 17), the damages wrought by a blackout are on the order of $10/kWh, though they vary widely and tend to be lesser in lower-income countries 15.

In the United States, public utilities generally show 1-4 hours of blackout per customer per year on average, investor-owned utilities show 3-8 hours, and coopertive utilities show 4-10 hours 18.

Problem:
Blackouts
Solution:
Grid Operators Should Value Reliability

Transmission Losses

A fraction of electricity generated by power plants is lost in transmission. Factors that contribute to losses include high voltage, distance of transmission, poor workmanship, and variable loads 19.

The image: "transmission_losses.svg" cannot be found!

Source: World Bank 20.

If world grid losses were brought to German levels, it would save 960 TWh per year, more than 4% of all electricity generation.

Problem:
Transmission Losses
Solution:
Upgrade Aging Power Grids - U.S.

F-gases

F-gases (fluourinated gases) contibute to global warming, and grid infrastructure is a major source of them. One in particular, sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆), is used as an insulating gas in electrical transformers 21.

Several alternatives to SF₆ have been proposed, but none are ready to be widely deployed.

The image: "f_gas_gwp.svg" cannot be found!

Source: 22.

Problem:
F-Gases and Their Contribution to Global Warming
Solution:
Reduce F-Gas Emissions From Transformers

References

  1. BP. "Statistical Review of World Energy 2022". 2022. 2

  2. Kätelhön, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S., Bardow. A. "Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry". Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences of the United States of America 116(23), pp. 11187-11194. June 2019. 2

  3. International Energy Agency. "Sankey Diagram". Accessed April 18, 2019.

  4. Lord, M. et al. "Zero Carbon Industry Plan: Electrifying Industry". Beyond Zero Emissions. September 2018.

  5. International Energy Agency. "Global Energy & CO₂ Status Report". Accessed April 3, 2019.

  6. U.S. Energy Information Administration. "Electricity in the United States". Accessed September 8, 2019.

  7. Perez, M., Perez, R., Rábago, K., Putnam, M. "Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation". Solar Energy 180, pp. 412-422. March 2019.

  8. Shaner, M., Davis, S., Lewis, M., Caldeira, K. "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States". Energy & Environmental Science 11(4), pp. 914-925. 2018. 2

  9. MacDonald, A., Clack, C., Alexander, A., Dunbar, A., Wilczak, J., Xie, Y. "Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO₂ emissions". Nature Climate Change 6, pp. 526–531. January 2016.

  10. Fu, R., Remo, T., Margolis, R. "2018 U.S. Utility-Scale Photovoltaics Plus-Energy Storage System Costs Benchmark". National Renewable Energy Laboratory. November 2018.

  11. Lazard. "Levelized Cost of Storage Analysis, Version 4.0". November 2018.

  12. Adibi, M. M., Martins, N. "Impact of Power System Blackouts". 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. July 2015.

  13. Electricity Consumers Resource Council. "The Economic Impacts of the August 2003 Blackout". February 2004.

  14. Koran, M. "California power outages could cost region more than $2bn, some experts say". The Guardian. October 2019.

  15. Oseni, M. O., Pollitt, M. G. "The Economic Costs of Unsupplied Electricity: Evidence from Backup Generation among African Firms". University of Cambridge, Energy Policy Research Group, EPRG Working Paper 1326, Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1351. November 2013. 2

  16. Schmidthaler, M., Reichl, J. "Assessing the socio-economic effects of power outages ad hoc". Computer Science - Research and Development 31, pp. 157-161. March 2016.

  17. Schröder, T., Kuckshinrichs, W. "Value of Lost Load: An Efficient Economic Indicator for Power Supply Security? A Literature Review". Frontiers in Energy Research. December 2015.

  18. U. S. Energy Information Administration. "U.S. customers experienced an average of nearly six hours of power interruptions in 2018". U. S. Department of Energy. June 2020.

  19. Parmer, J. "Total Losses in Power Distribution and Transmission Lines (1)". Electrical Engineering Portal. August 19, 2013.

  20. The World Bank. "Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output)". Accessed September 16, 2015.

  21. United States Environmental Protection Agency. "GHGRP Electrical Equipment Production and Use". Accessed March 13, 2022.

  22. Rabie, M., Franck, C. "Assessment of Eco-friendly Gases for Electrical Insulation to Replace the Most Potent Industrial Greenhouse Gas SF₆". Environmental Science & Technology Letters 52(2). January 2018.