Worldwide, transportation consumes primary energy as follows.
Greenhouse gases from world transportation are estimated as follows.
Throughout the Transportation section, we generally quote energy figures in terms of the fuel used by the vehicle or the primary energy behind the fuel, while not including the energy required to manufacture and maintain the vehicle and infrastructure (e.g. roads, tracks, etc.). However, the latter values may be significant.
An electric car, in a city in which all grid electricity is from renewable or nuclear sources, has much lower greenhouse emissions than a gasoline car, but not zero emissions. The electricity is not truly zero carbon, and there are also emissions in the manufacturing of the vehicle. The latter are typically attributed to industry, rather than transportation, in national accounting.
Worldwide, transportation energy is dominated by petroleum-based fuels, and petroleum will continue to dominate well past 2050.
As is the case worldwide, transportation in the United States is predominately powered by fossil fuels and comes mainly in the form of motor vehicles.
The energy required to move a passenger one kilometer over long distances varies widely both between and within modes. The occupancy rate (percentage of seats occupied by passengers) and efficiency of the vehicle are two key variables that affect performance. In general, though, buses and electric rail tend to be the most efficient systems, while diesel rail such as Amtrak, aviation, and driving are less efficient.
The energy intensity of major modes of commuting, or other typical travel within cities, varies more within modes than between modes. The most important factor influencing the efficiency of bus and rail systems is the occupancy rate, or the portion of seats that are filled. Generally, transit systems in large, dense cities with heavy ridership are the most efficient.
There is wide variation of energy consumption both between and within different modes of transportation 14. No particular option is necessarily "the best" in general.
International Energy Agency. "Sankey Diagram". Accessed April 18, 2019. ↩
International Energy Agency. "Transport". Tracking Clean Energy Progress. Accessed October 22, 2019. ↩
U. S. Energy Information Administration. "Global Transportation Energy Consumption: Examination of Scenarios to 2040 using ITEDD". September 2017. ↩
Mason, J., Fulton, L., McDonald, Z. "A Global High Shift Cycling Scenario: The Potential for Dramatically Increasing Bicycle and E-bike Use in Cities Around the World, with Estimated Energy, CO2, and Cost Impacts". Institute for Transportation & Development Policy and the University of California, Davis. Commissioned by the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF), and the Bicycle Product Suppliers Association (BPSA). November 2015. ↩
Chester, M., Horvath, A. "Environmental Assessment of Passenger Transportation Should Include Infrastructure and Supply Chains". Environmental Research Letters 4June 2009. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Results". Accessed June 11, 2019. ↩
Hanova, J., Dowlatabadi, H. "Strategic GHG reduction through the use of ground source heat pump technology". Environmental Research Letters 2(4). November 2007. ↩
Staffell, I. "Guest post: Ten charts show how the world is progressing on clean energy". CarbonBrief. November 2018. ↩
Fridleifsson, I., Bertani, R., Huenges, E., Lund, J. "The possible role and contribution of geothermal energy to the mitigation of climate change". IPCC Scoping Meeting on Renewable Energy Sources, Proceedings, pp. 59-80. January 2008. ↩
Chester M. "Passenger Transportation LCA Database". Accessed December 6, 2019. ↩
Chester, M., Horvath, A. "High-speed Rail with Emerging Automobiles and Aircraft Can Reduce Environmental Impacts in California's Future". Environmental Research Letters 7(3). July 2012. ↩
U. S. Energy Information Administration. "Annual Energy Outlook". 2017. ↩
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data". Accessed March 2, 2019. ↩
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. "Table 4-20: Energy Intensity of Passenger Modes (Btu per passenger-mile)". Accessed May 23, 2019. ↩ ↩2
John Dunham & Associates. "Motorcoach Census". Prepared for the American Bus Association Foundation. February 2016. ↩
M.J. Bradley & Associates. "Comparison of Energy Use & CO₂ Emissions From Different Transportation Modes". Prepared for American Bus Association. May 2007. ↩
Minn, M. "Contested Power: American Long-Distance Passenger Rail and the Ambiguities of Energy Intensity Analysis". Sustainability. February 2019. ↩
M.J. Bradley & Associates. "Comparison of Energy Use & CO₂ Emissions From Different Transportation Modes". Prepared for American Bus Association. May 2007. ↩