Exotic Energy Sources

In this section, we review several miscellaneous energy production proposals. None of the following have the potential to make a significant contribution to the world's energy mix for the foreseeable future.

Piezoelectric Generation

Piezoelectricity is generated from pressure, such as under a floor or a roadway.

A study in Sydney, Australia, finds that, with improved technology, piezoelectric generators may be able to provide 0.5% of the electricity used by a central hub building at Macquarie University 1.

Studies have found that piezoelectricity from roadways 2, 3, 4 or airport runways 5 to be prohibitively expensive for general use, though research commissioned by the California Energy Commission claims a cost of $0.08-20/kWh, comparable to other distributed sources 6. Not considered is the impact of the generators on vehicle fuel economy.

While not suitable for general electricity production, piezoelectric generators may be useful for low power sensors where battery replacements or grid hookups are expensive 7.

Biomechanical Energy Harvesting

The human body releases thermal and kinetic energy which can be harvested for personal electronics. We estimate a power potential of about 4 watts per person: 2 W of recoverable thermal energy 8 and 2 W of recoverable kinetic energy 9. The latter is based on 16 W of recoverable energy across four devices and assumes three hours of walking time per day. Applied to 7.6 billion people, biomechanical energy could yield about 1 exajoule of energy per year, or less than 0.2% of world primary energy. This figure does not account for additional exertion required of people wearing devices, the fact that it might not be feasible to wear many biomechanical devices simultaneously, or the energy required to produce the devices.

Biomechanical harvesting has military applications 9 and potential use for personal electronics, but could not make a meaningful contribution to overall energy supply.

Rainfall

In theory, the kinetic energy of rainfall can be harvested for energy 10. However, the power density of a rainfall-powered generator has been estimated at 0.01 watts per square meter 11, or about 0.01% of power density of solar photovoltaics, far too low for practical power generation.

Zero-Point Energy

Due the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, a quantum system even at zero temperature does not have zero energy. The residual motion that must remain is called zero-point energy. Zero-point energy is central to a number of major open questions in theoretical physics 12, and it is hypothesized to be the dark energy that comprises 75% of the universe's mass-energy and drives the accelerating expansion of the universe 13, 14.

The Casimir effect is a force that arises from a quantized field, and it has been observed experimentally 15. Exploitation of the Casimir effect for energy production has been attempted, without conclusive results 16, 17.

Exploitation of negative entropy of quantum fluctuations could, in principle, allow a heat engine that transcends the Carnot limit, the maximum efficiency under thermodynamics 18. Even more speculatively, under currently undeveloped theories of quantum gravity, zero-point energy could be used for gravitational shielding 19, anti-gravitational effects 20, traversable wormholes and time travel 21, and warp drives 22. NASA's Eagleworks Laboratories are conducting research into a quantum vacuum thruster, which in principle could allow spacecraft without onboard propellant 23.

Despite claims, no extraction of zero-point energy has been independently verified, and most researchers do not believe it will be possible, for the foreseeable future and perhaps not in principle, to extract usable zero-point energy 24, 12, 25. Due to a history of scams, claims of zero-point energy devices should be met with great skepticism 26.

Other Speculative Physics

There are several proposed energy production systems based on speculative or pathological physical principles. As our understanding of physics remains incomplete, we cannot definitively rule out energy production based on unknown physics. However, the following should be regarded as highly implausible for the foreseeable future.

Hydrinos

Hydrinos are hypothetical hydrogen atoms in which the electron has fallen to an energy level below the ground state. Supposedly, energy can be extracted from the falling electron state 27. Claims of energy production from hydrinos have not been indepedently verified and most physicists reject the hydrino model 28, 29, 30, 31.

Neutrinos

Several companies claim to be able to capture usuable quantities of energy from neutrinos, but based on current understanding of physics, this is impossible. Since ordinary matter is mostly transparent to neutrinos, 1000 kilograms of matter would only be able to capture about 0.0001 neutrinos per second from the Sun, the main source of Earth's neutron flux 32. With energies up to 0.42 million electron-volts per neutrino, a 1000 kilogram apparatus would generate no more than about 7*10-18 watts of power 32. An apparatus the mass of the Earth could generate up to about 40 kW, not enough to power a typical car.

Quark Fusion

It was recently discovered that it is possible for two heavy baryons to undergo fusion and produce a doubly charmed baryon, consisting of two charmed quarks and one up quark, a neutron, and 12 MeV of excess energy. The reaction generates about 10 times the energy per unit mass of fuel compared to conventional deuterium-tritium fusion. However, the short lifetimes of the heavy baryons make the reaction unusable for energy production 33.

Perpetual Motion

A perpetual motion machine is a device which supposely produces work without energy input, or which spontaneously converts thermal energy into mechanical work, violating the first or second laws of thermodynamics respectively, or operates entirely without friction 34. As the principles of thermodynamics are firmly established, claims of perpetual motion or overunity devices should be met with extreme skepticism 35. Common forms of perpetual motion include endless bands, energy towers, overbalanced wheels, and wheels with mercury 36, 37.

References

  1. Li, X., Strezov, V. "Modelling piezoelectric energy harvesting potential in an educational building". Energy Conversion and Management 85, pp. 435-442. September 2014.

  2. Moure, A., Rodríguez, M., Rueda, S., Gonzalo, A., Rubio-Marcos, F., Cuadros, D., Pérez-Lepe, A., Fernández, J. "Feasible integration in asphalt of piezoelectric cymbals for vibration energy harvesting". Energy Conversion and Management 112, pp. 246-253. March 2016.

  3. Papagiannakis, A., Montoya, A., Dessouky, S., Helffrich, J. "Development and Evaluation of Piezoelectric Prototypes for Roadway Energy Harvesting". Journal of Energy Engineering 143(5). 2017.

  4. Roshani, H., Gholikhani, M. "A New Aspect of Roadways". Roads & Bridges. April 2020.

  5. Zhao, J., Wang, H. "Mechanistic Modeling and Economic Analysis of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Potential in Airport Pavements". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. August 2020.

  6. Hill, D., Agarwal, A., Tong, N. "Assessement of Piezoelectric Materials for Roadway Energy Harvesting: Cost of Energy and Demonstration Roadmap". DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability, prepared for the California Energy Commission. January 2014.

  7. Nechibvute, A., Chawanda, A., Luhanga, P. "Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices: An Alternative Energy Source for Wireless Sensors". Smart Materials Research, Article ID 853481, 13 pp. 2012.

  8. Riemer, R., Shapiro, A. "Biomechanical energy harvesting from human motion: theory, state of the art, design guidelines, and future directions". Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 8: 22. April 2011.

  9. Choi, Y., Lee, M., Jeon, Y. "Wearable Biomechanical Energy Harvesting Technologies". Energies 10(10), 1483. September 2017. 2

  10. Xu, W., Zheng, H., Liu, Y., Zhou, X., Zhang, C., Song, Y., Deng, X., Leung, M., Yang, Z., Xu, R., Wang, Z., Zeng, X., Wang, Z. "A droplet-based electricity generator with high instantaneous power density". Nature 578(7795). February 2020.

  11. Parthasarathy, R. "Can the teardrops that fall after reading bad science writing generate renewable electricity? Yes, they can.". The Eighteenth Elephant. February 2020.

  12. Calphysics Institute. "Introduction to Zero-Point Energy". Accessed September 11, 2020. 2

  13. Beck, C., Mackey, M. "Electromagnetic dark energy". International Journal of Modern Physics D 17(01), pp. 71-80. January 2008.

  14. Beck, C., Mackey, M. "Measurability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 379(1), pp. 101-110. June 2007.

  15. Lamoreaux, S. "Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6μm Range". Physical Review Letters 78(1), pp. 5-8. January 1997.

  16. Dmitriyeva, O., Moddel, G. "Test of zero-point energy emission from gases flowing through Casimir cavities". Space, Propulsion & Energy Sciences International Forum. Physics Procedia 38, pp. 8-17. 2012.

  17. Henriques, C. "Study of atomic energy shifts induced by Casimir cavities". Masters thesis, Universidade de Coimbra. September 2014.

  18. Roßnagel, J., Abah, O., Schmidt-Kaler, F., Singer, K., Lutz, E. "Nanoscale Heat Engine Beyond the Carnot Limit". Physical Review Letters 112: 030602. January 2014.

  19. Haisch, B., Rueda, A., Dobyns, Y. "Inertial mass and the quantum vacuum fields". Annalen der Physik 10(5), pp. 393-414. February 2001.

  20. Forward, R. "Guidelines to Antigravity". American Journal of Physics 31(3), pp. 166-170. March 1963.

  21. Morris, M., Thorne, K., Yurtsever, U. "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition". Physical Review Letters 61(13), p. 1446. September 1988.

  22. Alcubierre, M. "The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity". Classical and Quantum Gravity 11(5): L73. May 1994.

  23. White, H., March, P., Lawrence, J., Vera, J., Sylvester, A., Brady, D., Baily, P. "Measurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequency Cavity in Vacuum". Journal of Propulsion and Power 33(4), pp. 830-41. July 2017.

  24. Aiken, A., Sulcoski, M., Miller, L., Pellissier, S. "Zero-Point Energy: Can We Get Something From Nothing?". U. S. Army National Ground Intelligence Center. 2007.

  25. Moddel, G., Dmitriyeva, O. "Extraction of Zero-Point Energy from the Vacuum: Assessment of Stochastic Electrodynamics-Based Approach as Compared to Other Methods". Atoms 7(2): 51. May 2019.

  26. Orzel, C. "The Real Point of Zero Point". ScienceBlogs. May 2011.

  27. Mills, R. The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics. Self-published. January 2020 edition.

  28. de Castro, A. "Orthogonality criterion for banishing hydrino states from standard quantum mechanics". Physics Letters A 369(5-6), pp. 380-383. October 2007.

  29. Dombey, N. "The hydrino and other unlikely states". Physics Letters A 360(1), pp. 62-65. December 2006.

  30. Kunze, H. "On the spectroscopic measurements used to support the postulate of states with fractional principal quantum numbers in hydrogen". Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41(10):108001. May 2008.

  31. Rathke, A. "A critical analysis of the hydrino model". New Journal of Physics 7. May 2005.

  32. Djorgovski, G. "The Sun And The Birth of Neutrino Astronomy". Fall 2004. 2

  33. Karliner, M., Rosner, J. "Quark-level analogue of nuclear fusion with doubly heavy baryons". Nature 551, pp. 89-91. November 2017.

  34. Tsaousis, D. "Perpetual Motion Machine". Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1(1). January 2008.

  35. Angrist, S. "Perpetual Motion Machines". Scientific American. January 1968.

  36. Scientific American. "undefined". November 1911.

  37. Simanek, D. "Perpetual Futility: A short history of the search for perpetual motion". Lock Haven University. Accessed November 21, 2020.