Geothermal

Geothermal is the extraction of heat from below the Earth's surface for energy. Hot reservoirs can be used for electricity production, while warm reservoirs can be harvested directly for heat for industrial processes or district heating.

We recommend a research and development program into enhanced geothermal systems, but not into hydrothermal sea vents. These geothermal methods are detailed below, with hydrothermal sea vents discussed in the context of ocean energy.

Potential Cost

Geothermal power has the following current and future project costs.

The image: "Cost of Geothermal Power.jpg" cannot be found!

Sources: Beckers et al. 1, IEA et al. 2, International Renewable Energy Agency 3, Lazard 4, Logan et al. 5, OpenEI 6, Salvatore et al. 7, Shnell et al. 8, Energy Information Administration 9. Note that costs are highly site-specific.

The current high costs for enhanced geothermal reflects the fact that it is still an emerging technology, and mature EGS technology has the potential to be competitive with mainstream power generation.

Recovery of valuable minerals from geothermal brine, such as gold, cesium, rubidium, lithium, and silicates, could further improve the economics, though this is not done presently 10. Recovery of rare earth elements does not appear to be economically feasible 11.

Resource Potential and Environmental Considerations

The following shows potential annual production from several forms of geothermal energy.

The image: "geothermal_potential.svg" cannot be found!

Sources: Hiriart et al. for hydrothermal 12, Krewitt et al. 13 for world geothermal heat and electricity, and NREL 14 for US enhanced geothermal electricity. Current world geothermal production is given by BP 15 and the EIA 16, and current primary energy by BP 15.

The lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of geothermal power depends on the technology.

The image: "geothermal_ghg.svg" cannot be found!

Sources: Matek 17 and Schlömer et al. 18.

Enhanced Geothermal

An enhanced geothermal system (EGS) extracts heat from deep within the Earth and in environments that are not naturally porous. Unlike traditional hydrothermal geothermal energy, EGS resources are accessible from almost everywhere on Earth, though at varying cost and difficulty. Medium-grade EGS resources are widespread throughout the Western United States and available in other parts of the country, while low-grade resources are available almost everywhere 1. Estimated EGS reserves are 266,000 EJ 19, over 400 years of world primary energy consumption.

EGS functions by first drilling a deep well, known as an injection well, into the rock and injecting water at high pressure to create a network of fractures. After the reservoir has been created, another well, known as the production well, is drilled. This well is used to extract the hot water that has been injected in the previous step. The fluid can then be recycled through the system 20.

Following are estimates of potential EGS costs. Enhanced geothermal is a particularly attractive option for low-temperature industrial processes such as paper processing and biomass drying 1.

The image: "egs_price.svg" cannot be found!

Electricity is reported by Tester et al. 19 and assumes a cumulative $1 billion of investment and learning-by-doing improvement. Beckers et al. 1 report cost estimates for EGS for direct heat. NREL 14 estimates the cost for district heating, which is higher since not all extracted heat in a district system would be useful 21.

Even at a higher price, EGS for district heating should be competitive with natural gas prices observed since 2005 22. Further cost reductions may be possible through combined district heating and cooling systems 23.

EGS technology does not face any obvious technical barrier and is currently undergoing demonstration deployment, notably at Cooper Basin in Australia 24. Nevertheless, additional deployment is needed to reduce costs.

Problem:
Slow Development of Enhanced Geothermal
Solution:
Research and Development into Enhanced Geothermal

Geothermal will be needed to reach 2050 emission goals.

Problem:
Need to Achieve Net Zero Emissions
Solution:
Accelerate Development and Deployment of Geothermal

In addition, in the United States, permitting requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) can cause significant delay to geothermal projects and may greatly slow the development of enhanced geothermal resources.

Problem:
Slow Development of Enhanced Geothermal
Solution:
Categorical Exclusion for Geothermal

Induced Seismicity

Earthquakes and increased seismic activity have hampered EGS development 25. Studies in Finland have shown limited interaction between seismic activity and fluid injection, with a proportionate amount of seismic energy and hydraulic energy input, and seismic activity is not time-delayed 26. However, an earthquake in South Korea that injured about 70 people and caused extensive damage 27 has been associated with a nearby EGS project. Researchers believe that the fluid injection added pressure to an existing at-risk fault line, pushing it over the tipping point and triggering the seismic event 28.

Assessing seismic risk should be part of EGS deployment. Switzerland’s mitigation plan for induced seismicity involves limiting the areas of hydraulically stimulated fracture planes and avoiding densely populated areas and at-risk faultlines 29. Japan’s Beyond-Brittle Project seeks to utilize ductile basements, which are rock formations characterized by their ability to deform in response to stress without fracturing 30. Deep closed-loop geothermal wells could also provide a solution to seismic risks as well as broaden the range of potential sites to global levels 31.

Supervolcano Risk

A supervolcanic eruption, such as threatened at Yellowstone National Park, would be a catastrophic event. Reducing the buildup of heat in a potentially supervolcanic caldera may reduce the risk. This could be done by drilling holes over the top of the magma chamber, drilling holes around the perimeter of a supervolcano, and managing the water supply within a caldera 32. The second of these solutions would allow energy production via enhanced geothermal systems 32. However, such an approach could take thousands of years to safely cool a caldera, and there remain unknown risks of inducing an eruption and generally the mechanics of how supervolcanoes work 32.

References

  1. Beckers, K., Lukawski, M., Anderson, B., Moore, M., Tester, J. "Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from Enhanced Geothermal Systems". Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 6(1). January 2014. 2 3 4

  2. International Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. "Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: 2015 Edition". September 2015.

  3. International Renewable Energy Agency. "Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017". January 2018.

  4. Lazard. "Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis - Version 12.0". November 2018.

  5. Logan, J. et al. "Electricity Generation Baseline Report". National Renewable Energy Laboratory. January 2017.

  6. OpenEI. "Transparent Cost Database". Accessed May 11, 2019.

  7. Salvatore, J. et al. "Cost of Energy Technologies". World Energy Council, with Bloomberg New Energy Finance. 2013.

  8. Shnell, J., Hiriart, G., Nichols, K., Orcutt, J. "Energy from Ocean Floor Geothermal Resources". Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015. April 2015.

  9. U.S. Energy Information Administration. "Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation". February 2019.

  10. Neupane, G., Wendt, D. "Potential economic values of minerals in brines of identified hydrothermal systems in the US". Idaho Natoinal Lab, GRC Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, October 1–4, 2017. October 2017.

  11. Zierenberg, R., Fowler, A., Reed, M., Palandri, J. "Maximizing REE Recovery in Geothermal Systems". U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. March 2018.

  12. Hiriart, G., Prol-Ledesma, R., Alcocer, S. Espíndola, S. "Submarine Geothermics; Hydrothermal Vents and Electricity Generation". Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010. April 2010.

  13. Krewitt, W., K. Nienhaus, C. Klessmann, C. Capone, E. Stricker, W. Graus, M. Hoogwijk, N. Supersberger, U. von Winterfeld and S. Samadi. "Role and Potential of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency for Global Energy Supply". Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesambt), Dessau-Rosslau, Germany. 2009.

  14. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. "U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis". 2012. 2

  15. BP. "Statistical Review of World Energy". June 2019. 2

  16. U. S. Energy Informtation Administration. "Electric Power Monthly". Accessed August 7, 2019.

  17. Matek, B. "Promoting Geothermal Energy: Air Emissions Comparison and Externality Analysis". Geothermal Energy Association. April 2013.

  18. Schlömer S., T. Bruckner, L. Fulton, E. Hertwich, A. McKinnon, D. Perczyk, J. Roy, R. Schaeffer, R. Sims, P. Smith, and R. Wiser. Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 2014.

  19. Tester, Jefferson W., et al. "Impact of enhanced geothermal systems on US energy supply in the twenty-first century". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365.1853, pp. 1057-1094. 2007. 2

  20. ScienceDirect. Enhanced Geothermal System. ScienceDirect Topics. Accessed March 26, 2024.

  21. T. J. Reber. "Master thesis". Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 2013.

  22. U. S. Energy Information Administration. "U. S. Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Customers". Accessed August 7, 2019.

  23. Rogowska, A. "District Cooling by a Geothermal Heat Source". The United Nations University, Geothermal Training Programme. 2003.

  24. Australian Renewable Energy Agency. "Cooper Basin Enhanced Geothermal Systems". Accessed August 7, 2019.

  25. Lowell, R. P., Kolandaivelu, K., Rona, P. A. Hydrothermal Activity. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. 2014.

  26. Kwiatek, G., Leonhardt, M., Martínez-Garzón, P., Pentti, M., Bohnhoff, M., Dresen, G. Seismicity associated with 2018 and 2020 hydraulic stimulations at EGS in Helsinki, Finland, shows limited earthquake interaction: Implication for seismic hazard assessment. EGU General Assembly 2021, EGU21-12217. April 2021.

  27. Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A.P., Manconi, A., Lopez-Comino, J.A., Clinton, J.F., Westaway, R., Cauzzi, C., Dahm, T., Wiemer, S. The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea. Science 360(6392), pp. 1003-1006. April 2018.

  28. Woo, J.U., Kim, M., Sheen, D.H., Kang, T.S., Rhie, J., Grigoli, F., Ellsworth, W.L., Giardini, D. An In‐Depth Seismological Analysis Revealing a Causal Link Between the 2017 MW 5.5 Pohang Earthquake and EGS Project. JGR Solid Earth 124(12), pp. 13060-13078. December 2019.

  29. Meier, P. M., Rodríguez, A. A., Bethmann, F. Lessons Learned from Basel: New EGS Projects in Switzerland Using Multistage Stimulation and a Probabilistic Traffic Light System for the Reduction of Seismic Risk. World Geothermal Congress, 2015.

  30. Asanuma, H., Tsuchiya, N., Muraoka, H., Itô, H. Japan Beyond-Brittle Project: Development of EGS Beyond Brittle-Ductile Transition. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. 2015.

  31. van Oort, E., Chen, D., Ashok, P., Fallah, A. "Constructing deep closed-loop geothermal wells for globally scalable energy production by leveraging oil and gas ERD and HPHT well construction expertise". In SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition (p. D021S002R001). SPE. March 2021.

  32. Wilcox, B. H., Mitchell, K. L., Schwandner, F. M., Lopes, R. M. "Defending Human Civilization from Supervolcanic Eruptions". Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. 2015. 2 3